Bullies have been around as long as humans have roamed this
earth. It is a result of an insecurity married with a lack of ability to reason
with another individual that forces the bully to feel they have to show a false
sense of greater power in order to get their point across. It has become one of
the key words over the last few years in the political universe as well.
In decades past kids whom were bullied were told to fight
back. Once the bully knew it was no longer an easy win, they would back down
and find another to try to express their perceived power over. Of course, with
the change in times and social climate, those people no longer have that
direction to take. Even a small retaliatory reaction after months or years of
abuse can cause the bullied to be in even more trouble than the bully.
The school yard has historically been the home of bullies,
with the lunch money swiping big guy towering over the small shaky boy taking
everything including homework and pride. There is a class of work place bully
that fits into the newly focuses political arena also. Without the ability to
manage others, the work place bully forces desired results with intimidation
and threats rather than encouragement and guidance.
Sports also had an unseen bully factor until recently. The
Miami Dolphins brought much of that to light with the Incognito/Martin
incident. Bullying was also present on the fields; it is just hard for the fan
to notice from the nosebleed seats above. During the 80’s and 90’s Gary Payton,
Michael Jordan and Larry Bird were infamous for their trash talking and
belittling of other players. Fans appreciated them for their success and
skills, but other players were often left with their feelings hurt and heads
hanging in defeat both mentally and physically.
But we have experienced bullying techniques in the outdoors
world as much as any. There is a constant battle between the haves and the
have-nots. There is a constant bashing of those that approve of a different
style and technique with those that approve of only one type of hunting. There
is a constant clash between outdoorsmen and self-proclaimed conservationists.
I witnessed several months ago a very public battle on
social media between two heavy weights in the outdoors world. Off handed
comments, low hitting insults, and possible false accusations were thrown out
like candy on Halloween. Venomous talk between the two damaged my perception of
both. These two respected hunters and outdoorsmen lost my all of my respect.
Was it because one had more sponsorships, more fans, or more viewers? I do not
know for sure, but it caused a rift that divided fans and outdoorsmen, and
brought in questions as to the real focus of various television shows as
related to hunting.
It does not stop there. I even catch myself in disagreements
over some things. For instance, some hunters only believe a hunt is a hunt if
it one person, self-guided, with one particular style of weapon or technique. I
primarily bowhunt, and have made comments in private that the reason I like to
bowhunt is because to me, sitting in a boxed stand from hundreds of yards away
waiting for Mr. Big to show is not hunting. I am wrong. It is hunting. It is
just a different style.
A guided hunt does not make one any less of a hunter than
one that self-guides. A different skill set maybe, but not less of a hunter.
Yes, some hunts are easier, with a higher potential for
success. But it is no reason to attack and bash another.
The battles between PETA, and other factions and
organizations against outdoorsmen are too numerous to account for. They are
rarely conservation groups. Conservation and preservation are different
entirely. If you were to look up conservation in a Google search, there are
definitions that merge the two words. However, those definitions are wrong.
Preservation prevents the hunting of wildlife and the use of the habitat.
Conservation controls the habitat and wildlife in a manner to sustain it for
the future. Of course, this can go on to another essay altogether, and probably
should. But bullying tactics from both sides are used in order to get the upper
hand in the argument.
We, as individuals, need to understand the
consequences of not only our actions, but our reactions as well. We need to
know that sometimes a push from our power can gain what we want, but it is a
false gain, as those affected are driven further away from whatever our cause
may be. And as hunters, anglers, and outdoorsmen in general, we need the
respect and support of the majority in order to teach and experience those
things we enjoy with our future generations.
Great post, Bill, and right to the point. I wish people could understand these things better, but I am afraid in reality it's people nature and it's not going to change. oh, well. gotta start somewhere -- I will start with myself.
ReplyDeleteThanks Dan. After re-reading, I see a few mistakes in my writing skills as well! One thing at a time I guess. :)
Delete